
Why Probationary Federal Employees Need to Prioritize Retirement Planning Now
The Office of Special Counsel has made clear probationary employees have limited protections. Why retirement planning should still start in year one.

The Office of Special Counsel has made clear probationary employees have limited protections. Why retirement planning should still start in year one.

The House has dropped a proposal that would have raised required federal retirement contributions. What was avoided, and why it is likely to return.

Extended bans on RIFs and reorganizations have bought federal employees time. What to do with a reprieve that is temporary by design.

A judge has blocked an effort threatening the job security of thousands of federal employees. Why a win in court still leaves the planning work to you

Probationary employees often have to work out their rights alone. Retirement is the one area where nobody should, and where waiting costs the most.

A pending House bill would raise required retirement contributions while trimming benefits. What the proposal would change if it becomes law.

OMB has told agencies to monitor on-site attendance closely. Why workplace policy swings are a reason to lock down your benefits, not to wait.

Tighter attendance monitoring looks like a minor policy update. The knock-on effects it can have on telework, locality pay and your retirement plan.

Federal benefits are strong and most people leave value in them unclaimed. Where the gaps usually are, and how to reassess your plan properly.

A reintroduced bill would raise line-of-duty death benefits for federal employees. What the increase would mean for surviving families.

Legislative proposals would change probationary periods and the protections attached to them. What to know in your first years of federal service.

Legal challenges to RIF policy have left federal employees uncertain about what holds. How to protect a retirement plan built up over decades.